Proceedings
of The World Avocado Congress III, 1995 143 - 159
AVOCADO
NUTRITION - A REVIEW
E. Lahav
Dept. of Horticulture,
Agricultural Research Organization,
The Volcani Center,
Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.
Summary
Avocado trees are known to have relatively low
demand for nutrients. This assumption is based on:
(a) few mineral deficiencies
that are found in commercial plantations (mainly N, Zn and Fe)
(b) very low nutrient
removal (based on 10t/ha yield, 11 kg N; 2 kg P and 20 kg K).
(c) No significant yield
increase from addition of N, P, or K in field experiments.
Added N benefits the avocado
almost universally. Its affects mainly growth but much less the production.
Increased amounts of nitrogen do not give any advantage to avocado production
but on the other hand increase pollination of underground water with nitrates.
Leaf analysis is still the
best way to assess nutritional needs of the avocado tree. Standardization of
leaf sampling should be very accurate in order not to misinterpret the results
received
Major problems still to be
investigated are:
1. Calibration of critical
levels in the leaves.
2. Establishing the
relationship between nutritional level and alternate bearing.
3. The use of microelements
in foliar sprays during critical growth periods.
4. The use of boron to
increase fruit set.
5. Calibration of fertilizer
applications in relation to the nutrient demand, in order to reduce damage to
the environment.
Additional index words
During the years, many research projects have been conducted in avocado nutrition in many growing areas in the world. The basic nutrition requirements of the avocado are quite known but it seems that our understanding of the subject have reached a plateau. Differences exist in the results of fertilizer experiments carried out in different parts of the world. In some places a marked increase in tree growth was found after fertilization, while in others no response was observed. In most places no relationship was found between the level of most nutrients in the leaves and yields. Moreover, it seems that the great variability among trees in the same plot and among trees in their "on" and "off" years, causes a deviation of the average, resulting in inaccurate interpretation of the results.
It is impossible to cover
all aspects of the mineral nutrition of the avocado in this review. Only the
subjects of nutrient removal, amount of nitrogen and leaf analysis will be
discussed.
Nutrient removal
The avocado tree is well
known for its low demand of nutrients (Lahav and Kadman, 1980). This is
demonstrated by the low total content of nutrients in the crop as compared with
other fruit trees and field crops (Table 1). On the basis of nutrient removal
by avocado crop of 10t/ha all the nitrogen removed will be compensated by 55
kg/ha of (NH4)2SO4
and the
potassium by only 33 kg/ha of KCl (table 2).
Nitrogen seems to be the
most important element in avocado nutrition. Deficiencies of nitrogen in
avocado result in small, pale leaves, early leaf drop, and smaller and fewer
fruits (Lahav and Kadman, 1980). In addition, nitrogen deficient trees were
found to be more susceptible to frost damage (Lahav et al., 1987). In many
growing areas, avocado growers tend to apply large amounts of nitrogen to their
plantations. Field experiments with high level of nitrogen in Israel showed that
nitrogen (as NH4N03) reduced soil pH (Table 3), increased
iron chlorosis (Table 4) and somewhat tree size (Table 5), but had no affect on
yields of cvs. Ardith and Ettinger (Table 6). However, a remarkable negative
effect on yields of cv. Hass was found (Table 7). A similar experiment in
California (Meyer et al., 1991) showed no effect of N on tree volume (Table 8),
or yield (Table 9).
Too much N has
been reported to reduce fruit set in Fuerte avocado in another experiment in California
(Crowley, 1992). In all experiments N levels in the leaves were significantly
affected by N application (Figs 1,2). These data suggest that mature avocado
orchards may have sufficient N that cycles within the system to support normal
growth and production. It also suggests that relatively small amounts of
nitrogenous fertilizer should be applied to avocado plantations. This is
indicated also by Avilan et al. (1978) in Venezuela assuming soil organic
matter of 1% and a crop of 15 t/ha, that 25 crops of avocado could be produced
from the soil N. Also, even a low application rate of 125 kg N/ha, results in
2/3 waste of N by volatilization or leaching.
Nitrogen is also related to
improper use of fertilizers resulting in groundwater contamination which is
becoming increasingly important issue. The chief pollutant at the present is
nitrate which is applied routinely in quantities much greater than those
actually required for the growth of the avocado. Presently, nitrate
contamination of ground water is perceived as one of the most severe
environmental problems. The best way to overcome this problem is probably to
calibrate fertilizer applications to the nutrient demand and seasonal growth
patterns in the avocado as suggested by Whiley et al. (1988). However, very
little data and experimental results exists in this direction.
Leaf Analysis
The ability of the avocado
tree to take up and utilize mineral nutrients is reflected in the concentration
of each nutrient in the tissue. Chemical analysis of the leaves provides
therefore valuable information on the nutritional status of the tree. Though
the soil is almost always the source of mineral nutrients, soil analyses
provides information on the total amount of a nutrient available and not on the
amount taken up. Soil analysis also do not give consistent results and do not
reflect the adequacy of nutrients for the avocado tree. Thus, despite the fact
that in many cases also leaf analyses do not show direct relationship between
the nutrient concentration in the tissue and the yield, it is still the best
means of assessing the nutritional state of the tree.
In order to ensure accurate
interpretation of avocado leaf analyses - the most important tool for
determining nutrient status of the tree - only leaves of the spring flush
should be sampled (Lahav et al., 1990). These leaves are sampled during the
period between September and November. Seasonal changes in the Ca, K, N, B, Fe
and Mn levels have been shown to occur (Bingham, 1961). For this reason, leaf
samples taken at other times of the year or from other flushes have little
value for diagnosing deficiencies since the analyses data are not calibrated
with yield and growth data of the tree. The leaves can be identified easily
according to the rind of buds marking the end of the previous year's growth.
After sampling, the leaves of the spring and summer flushes can be identified
according to their Ca content (Figs 1 and 2). In autumn sampling, the Ca level
in the summer flush leaves will never exceed 1.6% while that of the spring
flush will always be above 1.8% (Lahav et al., 1990).
Conclusions
Over the past years, much
progress has been made in avocado nutrition, especially in fertilization
programs and leaf analysis as a tool to determine the nutritional demand of the
tree. However, avocado nutrition is still far from being perfected and there
are major problems still to be investigated as:
- Calibration of critical levels in the leaves,
- Establishing the
relationship between nutritional level and alternate bearing or more specific a
better understanding of the way in which carbon and N are allocated to
different plant parts during the year,
- The use of microelements in foliar sprays during
critical growth periods,
- The use of boron to increase fruit set
- Calibration of fertilizer
application in relation to the nutrient demand in order to reduce damage to the
environment. This probably can be done most efficiently by developing advanced
fertigation programs.
References
Avilan, R.L.,
Chirinos, A., and Figueroa, M., 1979. Quantification of some minerals extracted
from the soil by an avocado crop. Proc. of the Trop. Region Amer. Soc. Hort.
Sci. 27: 108-113.
Bingham, F.T., 1961.
Seasonal trends in nutrient composition of Hass avocado leaves. Amer. Soc.
Hort. Sci. 78: 149-160.
Crowley, D.E., 1992. Soil
fertility and the mineral nutrition of avocado. Circular No. CAS-92/1 Calif.
Avocado Soc. Inc.
Lahav, E.,
Bar, Y., and Kalmar, D., 1990. Effect of nitrogenous fertilization on the
annual variations in nutrients in avocado leaves. Commun. in Soil Sci. Pl.
Anal. 21: 1353-1365.
Lahav, E., and Kadman, A.,
1980. Avocado fertilization. Bull. Intern. Potash Inst. No. 6 Worblaufen-Bern,
Switzerland.
Lahav, E., Kalmar, D., and
Bar, Y., 1987. Nitrogen fertilization a guarantee for relative resistance of
avocado trees to frost. J. Pl. Nutr. 10: 1859-1868.
Meyer, J.L., Arpaia, M.L.,
Yates, M.V., Takele, E., Bender, G., and Witney, G., 1991. Irrigation and
fertilization management of avocados. Calif. Avocado Soc. Ann. Meeting. Sept.
27, 1991, Ventura Ca. p. 33-48.
Whiley, A.W., Saranah,
J.13., Cull, B.W., and Pegg, K.G. 1988. Manage avocado tree growth cycles for
productivity gains. Queensland Agric. J. 114: 29-36.