Proc. of
Evaluation of Phytophthora Root Rot-Suppressive Soils from California Avocado Groves
M. K. Rahimian and W. L. Casale
Department
of Plant Pathology,
Abstract.
Phytophthora root rot
(PRR) of avocado (Persea
In
the early 1970's, Broadbent and Baker (1974) reported on soils from avocado
groves in
Since sporangia are the fungal structures that release zoospores, the primary infectious stage of P. cinnamomi, decreased sporangium production means a lower potential for disease. Lysis of P. cinnamomi mycelium in the suppressive soils was also observed. When soil that was initially suppressive to root rot was steamed at 100C for 30 min, the soil no longer suppressed disease; soil steamed at 60C, however, retained its suppressiveness. This was interpreted as indicating soil microorganisms that survived steaming at 60C, but not 100C, were responsible for disease suppression.
Although
conditions in
Materials and Methods
Survey of avocado groves for PRR-suppressiveness. Southern California avocado groves were surveyed (in collaboration with Dr. John Menge, Dept. of Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside) to identify sites on which trees had little or no root rot despite the presence of P. cinnamomi in the soil or the occurrence of PRR and P. cinnamomi in neighboring groves. These liberal criteria were used to tentatively identify soils as PRR-suppressive to reduce the likelihood of ignoring a soil that might be useful in yielding biocontrol agents or other valuable information.
Greenhouse tests for suppressiveness. Soil was collected from the root zones of avocado trees at the suspected suppressive sites identified during the survey described above. These soils were tested for suppression of root rot in the greenhouse. Greenhouse tests seemed more apt to select soils that were suppressive due to a biological component, eliminating soils that, for example, have reduced root rot because of superior drainage in the field. Also, the ability to observe disease suppression in the greenhouse would facilitate subsequent experiments and allow for greater control of environmental variables.
Initial tests for suppressive soils were performed using an indicator plant, Persea indica, that is related to avocado but is smaller and somewhat more convenient to use than avocado. P. indica is a very sensitive indicator of P. cinnamomi on which symptoms develop quickly: roots rot and the stem becomes blackened.
After field soils were screened to remove large stones and other debris, the soils were infested with ground millet seed cultures of P. cinnamomi at 1 g/L soil. Soils were mixed thoroughly to distribute the inoculum evenly. P. indica seedlings were transplanted into the infested field soils. Plant growth and root rot was monitored over several months.
Similar experiments were performed using the highly susceptible avocado cultivar, Topa Topa.
Importance of biological component to suppressiveness. The contribution of soil microorganisms to reducing disease caused by P. cinnamomi was tested by comparing disease in soil sterilized by autoclaving with disease in natural soil. Soil was autoclaved for 1 h, then infested with ground millet seed cultures of P. cinnamomi at 1 g/L soil. Natural (non-autoclaved) soil was similarly infested. Six week-old Topa Topa seedlings were transplanted into these soils. Plant growth (shoot length, shoot dry weight and root dry weight) and percent root rot were determined after 8 weeks.
To determine whether autoclaving itself was in some way detrimental to the plants, and also to determine the proportion of natural soil required for disease suppression, natural and autoclaved soils were mixed in various proportions. The soil mixtures were immediately infested with P. cinnamomi and planted with Topa Topa seedlings as before.
Isolation of soil microorganisms and antagonism of P. cinnamomi in culture. Microorganisms from soils tentatively identified as suppressive were isolated in an attempt to obtain potential biocontrol agents for PRR. Soil samples were diluted in sterile water and spread onto a variety of growth media. As expected, a mixture of many fungi and bacteria grew on the culture plates. Pure cultures of the microorganisms were obtained by transferring individual colonies to fresh growth medium.
Laboratory assays for the ability of the isolated soil microorganisms to inhibit growth of P. cinnamomi in culture provided a means of assigning priority to test organisms for subsequent greenhouse screening for bio-control of disease, and these tests also indicated possible mechanisms of antagonism of P. cinnamomi in soil and biocontrol of PRR. P. cinnamomi and individual test organisms were placed on opposite sides of agar growth medium in a petri dish. As the two organisms grew together, antibiosis was indicated by a zone of inhibited growth of P. cinnamomi in the vicinity of the test organism. These interactions were microscopically observed for any other detrimental effects on P. cinnamomi.
Screening soil microorganisms for biocontrol in the greenhouse. Some mechanisms of antagonism observed in culture may not occur in soil; on the other hand, there may be mechanisms of antagonism in soil that are not expressed under the culture conditions we selected. Therefore, all isolated microorganisms are being tested for the ability to reduce disease caused by P. cinnamomi in the greenhouse.
Initial
screening for potential biocontrol agents was
performed using P. indica. Soil was infested
as before with ground millet seed cultures of P. cinnamomi
at 1 g/L soil. This inoculum level caused severe
disease in controls and thus provided a fairly stringent screening procedure.
Fungi to be tested for biocontrol ability were added
to soil as wheat bran cultures (8 g/L soil); bacteria to be tested were applied
by dipping roots in a liquid suspension of the organisms, then transplanting
the test plants into infested soil. Plant growth and root rot was monitored
over several months.
Results
Survey of avocado groves for PRR-suppressiveness. Seven sites in Santa Barbara Co. and 6 sites in San Diego Co. fit our criteria for PRR-suppressiveness. At several of these sites trees approximately 35 years old or older were on highly susceptible rootstocks (e.g., cv. Topa Topa) but these trees were not suffering from severe root rot.
Greenhouse tests for suppres-siveness. Three (soils CARP2, CARP4, and CARP5) of the 7 Santa
Barbara Co. soils, and 1 (SAGOS) of the 6 San Diego
Avocado cv. Topa Topa also had significantly greater growth and less root rot in soils CARP4 and CARP5 compared to a conducive soil (SAG05) (Fig. 3). Soil CARP2 was also suppressive in the experiments with Topa Topa', but to a lesser degree than were CARP4 and CARP5 (Fig. 3).
Importance of biological component to suppressiveness. Suppressiveness of soils CARP4 and CARP5 was eliminated after sterilizing these soils by autoclaving for 1 h (CARP4 example shown in Fig. 3 and 4). This indicated that suppressiveness in these soils was due to soil microorganisms.
When natural soil was mixed with the same soil sterilized by autoclaving, mixtures containing 25% or greater natural soil had less root rot and greater growth of Topa Topa plants (Table 1). Interestingly, 50% natural soil was actually more suppressive than 100% natural soil in the experiment shown in Table 1. Apparently, therefore, autoclaved soil was itself not detrimental to plants.
Isolation of soil microorganisms and antagonism of P. cinnamomi in culture. Approximately 200 fungi and bacteria have been isolated from suppressive soils so far. Of the organisms isolated, 26 demonstrated inhibition of growth of P. cinnamomi in culture due to antibiosis. In some cases, inhibition of growth was accompanied by an obvious disruption of the hyphae of P. cinnamomi. One of the fungi were observed tightly coiling around hyphae of P. cinnamomi, which suggested mycoparasitism.
Screening soil microorganisms for biocontrol
in the greenhouse. Whereas most of the test microorganisms were not
effective at controlling disease of P. indica in
the greenhouse, 15 fungi and bacteria tested so far have shown significant
reduction in the level of disease caused by P. cinnamomi.
The microorganisms that were most effective with P. indica
are currently being tested using Topa Topa.
Discussion
A
survey of southern
Literature Cited
Broadbent, P. and K.F. Baker. 1974. Behavior of Phytophthora
cinnamomi in soils suppressive and conducive to
root rot. Austral. J. Agric. Res. 25:121-137.
Fig. 1. Growth of Persea indica seedlings in conducive (CARP 6) and suppressive (CARP 4) soils infested with Phytophthora cinnamomi.
Fig. 2. Persea indica seedlings grown in suppressive (CARP 4) and conducive (CARP 6) soils infested with Phytophthora
cinnamomi.
Fig. 3. Avocado (cv. Topa Topa) seedlings growing in
natural conducive (SAGO 5) or suppressive (CARP 2, 4, 5) soils, or autoclaved
CARP4 soil, infested with Phytophthora cinnamomi.
Fig. 4. Roots of avocado seedlings (shown in Fig. 3) grown in natural (left) or autoclaved CARP4 soil (right) infested with Phytophthora cinnamomi.
Table 1. Growth and root rot of avocado (cv. Topa Topa) plants in avocado grove soil (CARP4) infested with Phytophthora cinnamomi. |
||||
Soil mixture |
|
|
|
|
P. cinnamomi |
Natural:Autoclavedz |
Shoot length increase (cm)Y |
New shoot dry weight (g)x |
Root Rot (%)w |
Non-infested |
0:100 |
14.3 av |
3.58 a |
6 d |
lnfestedu |
0:100 |
1.0 d |
0.12 d |
80 a |
Infested |
10:90 |
3.6 c |
0.80 cd |
80 a |
Infested |
25:75 |
3.4 cd |
1.01 c |
69 b |
Infested |
50:50 |
10.5 b |
2.55 b |
27 cd |
Infested |
100:0 |
4.8 c |
2.54 c |
51 be |
z Six week-old avocado seedling were transplanted
into mixtures comprised of various proportions of natural:autoclaved
(for 1 h) [v:v] CARP4 soil. y Increase in shoot length since transplanting. x Dry weight of the segment of shoot tip of a length
equal to the increase in shoot length of individual plants since
transplanting. w Visual estimate of percentage of roots rotted. v Means with a common letter within columns are not
significantly different according to LSD (P<0.05). u Soil mixtures were infested with ground millet
seed cultures of Phytophthora cinnamomi at 1 g/L soil. |