Department
of Entomology,
We compared the susceptibility of seven cultivars of
avocado, Persea
Key
words: Persea
Historically, Californian avocados have been free of
economically serious arthropod pests. However, in 1990 the tetranychid mite, Oligonychus perseae Tuttle, Baker and
Abatiello, was first recorded in San Diego County, California, USA, and rapidly
spread throughout all avocado growing areas in California (Bender, 1993;
Thompson, 1993). At present this mite is the most serious foliar pest affecting
avocados in
The avocado, Persea
The goal of this study was to compare the
susceptibility of seven commercial avocado cultivars to O. perseae mite by (i) quantifying leaf damage on these cultivars
from field collected samples, and (ii) quantifying demographic parameters of O. perseae in the laboratory on
‘susceptible’ and ‘resistant’ cultivars identified from (i).
Quantifying
cultivar susceptibility to Oligonychus
perseae
The susceptibility of seven avocado cultivars to O. perseae was assessed by measuring
feeding damage on leaves collected from avocado trees grown in a single plot of
mixed cultivars at the South Coast Field Station in
Mite development and life table construction
Oligonychus
perseae
were reared in the laboratory on foliage of three avocado cultivars (and life
tables were constructed to calculate demographic parameters. ‘Lamb Hass’,
‘Pinkerton’ and ‘Hass’ which showed respectively, low, intermediate and high
levels of susceptibility to O. perseae
feeding in the susceptibility study above were used (see Results section).
Leaves were collected at South Coast Field Station
from the same trees that were used in the susceptibility study and used for
mite demographic studies. Leaf disks 22 mm diameter were cut with a cork borer
from collected leaves and disks were placed abaxial side up on water saturated
foam pads held in stainless steel pans. Oligonychus
perseae eggs collected on ‘Hass’ avocados in a commercial orchard
(Camarillo, California, U.S.A) or from a greenhouse colony maintained on ‘Hass’
avocados were placed individually on these disks. Thirty-six eggs were set up
simultaneously for all three cultivars. These constituted the initial cohorts
for birth females from which horizontal life tables were constructed to
estimate demographic growth parameters.
Leaf disks and O.
perseae were maintained at 25 ± 1°C under a long day light cycle
(Light:Dark, 16:8) and mites were checked every 24 hours and survivorship and
developmental stage were recorded. Upon emergence, adults were sexed and young
males (<24 hours old) were transferred to leaf disks with young females
(<24 hours old). Leaf disks were checked daily and the number of eggs laid
and immature mites born on each disk were recorded until all females died, and
all eggs had either hatched or died. In the event a leaf disk started to
deteriorate during the study, mites were moved to healthy leaf disks that were
cut at the beginning of the trial but upon which no mites had been reared. This
experiment was repeated, three different times through the 1998 growing season.
The first trial was started on April 17, the second trial started on May 27,
and the third trial started on
For each trial and each cultivar we calculated the
net reproductive rate (R0) and intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm)
as follows (Southwood, 1978):
and ![]()
with x pivotal age
lx number surviving to age x
mx age-specific fecundity
During the second trial, thirty-six larvae
born on each cultivar (June 18 to June 26, 1998) were transferred to fresh leaf
disks. Larvae were reared to adulthood under the same conditions as previously
described to estimate mortality and development rate of the second generation
on each cultivar.
Damage due to O.
perseae feeding on trees at South Coast Field Station during the 1998
growing season was measured in April, May, July, and November 1998. Five leaves
were collected on each of 3 trees of ‘Hass’, ‘Lamb Hass’ and ‘Pinkerton’ and
the percentage of leaf area damaged was measured with automated image analysis
software as described previously.
All statistical procedures were performed in
SAS v 6.12 (Statistical Analysis System,
Mortality rates for each developmental stage of O. perseae were compared among cultivars
with a Chi square test for each trial. In order to maintain the experimentwise
level of significance at P£0.05,
the level of significance for each of the three tests was adjusted to P=[0.05/3]=0.017. Duration of
development from larva to adult, female longevity, and female fecundity were
compared among cultivars and across trials with a 2-way ANOVA (trial x
cultivar). Average duration of development from larva to adult for the second
generation was compared among cultivars with an ANOVA.
Estimates of the means and their standard errors of
the net reproductive rate (R0) and of the intrinsic rate of natural
increase (rm) on each cultivar were computed with a Jacknife
procedure (Efron, 1981; Meyer et al.,
1986). Both R0 and rm were compared among cultivars and
across trials by means of a 2-way ANOVA (trial x cultivar).
RESULTS
Cultivar
susceptibility to O. perseae
Mean percentage of leaf area damaged on
leaves collected from seven cultivars at South Coast Field Station in February
was significantly different among cultivars (P£ 0.001). Average
leaf area damaged was categorized as low on ‘Fuerte’, ‘Lamb Hass’ and ‘Reed’
(13, 17, and 17%, respectively), and high on Gwen and ‘Hass’ (37 and 38%,
respectively). Damage was intermediate on ‘Esther’ and ‘Pinkerton’ at 30% each
(Figure1). Maximum leaf area damaged measured on leaves was 66% on ‘Gwen’ and
‘Hass’, 63 and 65% on ‘Esther’ and ‘Pinkerton’, respectively, and 35, 36 and
37% on ‘Fuerte’, ‘Lamb Hass’ and ‘Reed’, respectively.
Oligonychus perseae development and life table construction
Oligonychus
perseae survival from larva to adult on leaf disks varied through the season on
all three cultivars tested (Table 1). Survival was significantly different
across the three cultivars in April (p=0.006), when overall survival was
the lowest. In April, survival was highest on ‘Lamb Hass’ and lowest on ‘Hass’.
No significant difference among cultivars was observed on later dates (p=0.94
in May, and 0.58 in July).
Stage-specific mortality of O. perseae on leaf disks varied through time on all cultivars for
all developmental stages (Figure 2). However, neither larval mortality nor
deutonymph mortality differed significantly among cultivars. Larval mortality
was 35% in April (n= 86), decreased to 7% in May (n= 96) and increased again to
30% in July (n= 46) (Figure 2a). Similarly, deutonymph mortality decreased from
20% in April (n= 56) to 7% in May (n= 82) but then remained at 7% in July (n=
30) (Figure 2c). Protonymph mortality was significantly different among
cultivars (x2= 11.17; df= 2; p= 0.004). In April, 44% of
protonymphs died on ‘Hass’ (n= 16), 28% died on ‘Pinkerton’ (n= 18) and, none
died (n=22) on ‘Lamb Hass’. Protonymph mortality was similar on all cultivars
in May (7%, n= 89) and July (6%, n= 32) (Figure 2b).
Development on leaf disks from larva to adult took
approximately 10 days on all cultivars across all trials (Table 1). Longevity
of adult female O. perseae differed
significantly among cultivars (p= 0.011) and across trials (p=
0.0001) (Fig. 3a). On ‘Hass’, mean female longevity increased by 100% from 12
days in May (n= 6) to 24 days in July (n= 11). The increase of female longevity
was lower on ‘Pinkerton’ (+73% from April to May) and lowest on ‘Lamb Hass’
(Figure 3a). On ‘Lamb Hass’, mean female longevity initially increased from
April to May (+70%) but then decreased in July (-44%). Since only one female
reached adulthood on ‘Pinkerton’ in July, no data on longevity, fecundity and
demographic parameters are available. Mean fecundity was significantly
different among female O. perseae
reared on different cultivars (p= 0.0001) and across trials (p=
0.0001) (Figure 3b). Fecundity of females on leaf disks in May increased
greatly compared with that observed in April (3, 2 and 2.6 fold on ‘Hass’,
‘Lamb Hass’ and ‘Pinkerton’, respectively). Fecundity then decreased in July on
‘Lamb Hass’ (4 fold) while it increased further on ‘Hass’ (+26%) when compared
with May (Figure 3b).
Survival of larvae to adulthood as well as duration
of development from larva to adult for O.
perseae reared from eggs laid on leaf disks (F2) was similar on all
cultivars (x2= 1.64; df= 2; p= 0.44 and F= 1.41; df= 2, 39; p=
0.25, respectively). However, compared to the parent generation survival was
reduced on average by 50% and on ‘Hass’ and ‘Lamb Hass’ development tended to
be slower (Table 1).
Demographic parameters
Mean net reproductive rate (R0) and
intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm) varied significantly through
time (p=
0.0001 for both) and among cultivars (p=0.0001 for both) (Figure 4). On
all cultivars R0 and rm increased in May and decreased in
July. In April R0 and rm were highest on ‘Lamb Hass’.
However, in May and July R0 and rm were highest on
‘Hass’. The largest difference between ‘Lamb Hass’ and ‘Hass’ for both R0 and
rm was observed in July when negative population growth was observed
on ‘Lamb Hass’ (Figure 4b).
Leaf damage: 1998 growing
season
No measurable leaf damage due to feeding by O. perseae in the 1998 growing season
was observed until July. At this time, average percentage of leaf area damaged
was significantly higher on ‘Hass’ than on either ‘Lamb Hass’ or ‘Pinkerton’ (p=
0.0117). On average, 8% of the leaf area was damaged on ‘Hass’, while only 0.5
and 0.6% of the leaf area was damaged in July by O. perseae on ‘Lamb Hass’ and ‘Pinkerton’, respectively (Figure 1).
In November, leaf damage had increased to 13% on ‘Hass’, 10 % on ‘Pinkerton’
and 4% on ‘Lamb Hass’ and damage was significantly different across cultivars:
(p=
0.0028).
Comparison of visible damage among selected avocado
cultivars showed significant quantifiable differences in susceptibility to O. perseae feeding. At South Coast Field
Station, Hass and Gwen cultivars exhibited approximately twice as much leaf area
damaged as ‘Fuerte’, ‘Lamb Hass’, and ‘Reed’ avocados while damage on ‘Esther’
and ‘Pinkerton’ was intermediate.
Mite feeding damage can cause premature leaf
drop if severe enough (Bender, 1993; Faber, 1997). However, it is unknown
whether all cultivars studied here drop damaged leaves in response to similar
levels of damage. Thus, lower average percentage leaf area damaged estimates on
leaves collected from “resistant” trees may indicate leaf drop on those trees
as heavily damaged leaves have been shed and less damaged leaves were retained
which resulted in low damage estimates. We did not quantify leaf drop by each
cultivar studied. However, no obvious differences in leaf drop or secondary
leaf flush on cultivars studied was noticed when leaves were collected from
South Coast Field Station. For the Hass cultivar, there is no known finite
threshold of damage that causes leaf drop. However, the probability of leaf
drop in early summer increases when percentage leaf area damaged by O. perseae feeding exceeds 8% (Kerguelen
and Hoddle, unpublished). Thus, if cultivars with the lowest average leaf area
damaged (i.e. ‘Fuerte’, ‘Lamb Hass’, and ‘Reed’) were shedding slightly damaged
leaves, leaf drop would occur when less than 8% of leaf area was damaged by mite
feeding. Shedding leaves with such low levels of damage is probably unlikely.
In the laboratory, female longevity and fecundity,
and population growth (R0 and rm) estimates for O. perseae reared on young mature leaves
collected in July were significantly higher on the most susceptible cultivar
(‘Hass’) relative to the resistant cultivar (‘Lamb Hass’). However, no such
difference was observed on leaves collected in April or May. It is possible
that the intrinsic quality of avocado leaves may change through time so that by
summer leaves on the Hass cultivar become particularly favorable to O. perseae survival and reproduction.
Mid-summer outbreaks of O. perseae
are observed in commercial orchards infested with this pest in southern
Avocado leaves are toxic to various insects (Murakoshi
et al., 1976; Chang et al., 1975; Sneh and Gross, 1981;
Stein and Klingauf, 1990), mammals (Appleman, 1944; McKenzie and Brown, 1991;
Craigmill et al., 1992) and birds
(Burger et al., 1994). Furthermore,
differences in leaf chemistry and biochemistry among cultivars have been
demonstrated. For example, avocado cultivars vary in their terpene levels
(Bergh et al., 1973), phenol constituents, phenol biosynthesis enzyme
activities, and isozyme patterns (Brune and Van Lelyveld, 1982).
We observed neither increased mortality nor slower
development of O. perseae on
resistant cultivars (‘Lamb Hass’ and ‘Pinkerton’). Rather, the susceptible
cultivar (‘Hass’) was characterized by increased reproductive rates of O. perseae. Starting in the May 1998
bioassay, the average number of offspring per female was the highest on ‘Hass’,
and the difference among cultivars increased in July 1998. Not only did females
live longer on ‘Hass’ and therefore laid more eggs, but they also produced
offspring at a faster rate. In July, females produced on average one larva
every day on ‘Hass’, whereas on average females produced one larva every second
day on ‘Lamb Hass’. These results suggest that the observed difference of
cultivar susceptibility to O. perseae
is due to seasonal differences in nutritional quality of cultivars as no
difference was observed across cultivars before this time.
The nutritional requirements of phytophagous mites
are still not fully understood. Numerous studies have shown that the population
density and fecundity of various tetranychids on various hosts are dependent on
plant quality. Tetranychids pierce the parenchyma tissue of leaves with their
stylets and siphon out the cells’ contents (Van der Geest, 1985; Jeppson et al., 1975). Consequently, mite nutrition
is directly affected by the chemical composition of ingested fluids. Plant
quality is modified directly by fertilizers and indirectly by pesticide
treatments which can induce hormoligosis (Rodriguez, 1964; Huffaker et al., 1969; Jesiotr et al., 1979).
Although results are not always consistent, tetranychids are sensitive to the
chemical composition of the host, particularly to nitrogen levels. Studies on Tetranychus urticae (Acari:
Tetranychidae) have demonstrated a positive correlation between population
growth and leaf sugar concentrations of several host plants (Rodriguez et al., 1960; Rodriguez and Cambell,
1961). Conversely, an over abundance of amino acids in the diet can be
detrimental to T. urticae as excess
amino acids induces excessive osmotic pressure in the hemolymph (Sun, 1963). No
conclusive results have been obtained regarding the relationship between
vitamins in host plants and tetranychid population growth (Rodriguez and
Rodriguez, 1952).
The chemical composition of sap and leaves of
avocados varies both with time of year and cultivar. Nitrogen content of ‘Hass’
avocado leaves growing in the spring increases through the summer and then
drops in the fall and winter (Lahav et al.,
1989). Increased nitrogen levels could explain why populations of O. perseae increase on ‘Hass’ over
summer. However, the same pattern of variation of nitrogen content was observed
for ‘Fuerte’, a cultivar that is resistant to O. perseae. Thus, it may be unlikely that nitrogen content of
leaves is fully responsible for observed differences in susceptibility among
the cultivars examined in this work. Amino acid content in ‘Hass’ avocados has
been reported to drop from a maximum level in May to a minimum level in August
before increasing again in the fall (El-Hamalawi and Menge, 1995). These
variations are consistent with nutritional studies that indicated that an
excess of amino acids was detrimental to tetranychid mites (Sun, 1963).
However, no comparable data on amino acid cycles are available for the resistant
cultivars we studied and we can not speculate on the role of excess amino acid
production as a resistance mechanism.
Starch and sugar content of avocado trees can also
vary through the growing season. Sugar and starch levels are maximal in late
winter-early spring and drop through the summer to reach minimum levels in the
fall (Cameron and Borst, 1938; Scholefield et al., 1985; El-Hamalawi and Menge,
1995). Thus, if O. perseae population
densities are correlated with carbohydrate contents in the trees, the
correlation is a negative one. Similar starch and sugar cycles have been
observed on susceptible (‘Hass’) and resistant (‘Fuerte’) cultivars, suggesting
that cycling carbohydrate contents alone may not be responsible for cultivar
differences in susceptibility to O.
perseae.
When leaf damage was measured in February 1998 at the
end of the 1997 growing season and again late in the 1998 season (November
1998) percentage leaf area damaged on ‘Pinkerton’ was intermediate between
damage on ‘Lamb Hass’ and damage on ‘Hass’. However, at mid-season (July 1998)
damage on ‘Pinkerton’ was low and similar to damage on ‘Lamb Hass’. Thus, if
the same change in nutritional quality of leaves is responsible for
susceptibility to O. perseae on
‘Hass’ and ‘Pinkerton’, it is evidently delayed on ‘Pinkerton’. This
observation will guide future efforts to identify which biochemical processes
may determine susceptibility to O.
perseae through examining changes in nutritional quality that occur at
different times on Hass and Pinkerton cultivars.
Further work is required to determine if the chemical
composition of resistant and susceptible cultivars and seasonal variation of
these compounds affects the longevity and fecundity of O. perseae. Secondary plant compounds like avocado furans in idioblasts
oil cells in leaves have been shown to have insecticidal properties and may be
important in avocado resistance to O.
perseae (Rodriguez-Solana and Trumble, 1998; Rodriguez-Solana et al., 1998). Correlative studies
determining relationships between avocado furans and O. perseae demographics would be a first step to ascertain if
changes in these compounds throughout the year affect O. perseae development. If correlations were detected intensive
bioassay-driven tests to identify the exact resistance compounds could then be
undertaken. A better understanding of the biochemical processes that may
mediate cultivar resistance to O. perseae
will assist with breeding efforts designed to select for resistance to this
pest. Furthermore, other factors not addressed in this study may contribute to
observed resistance of cultivars to O.
perseae. For example, hairs on the underside leaves are noticeably denser
on ‘Lamb Hass’ than on ‘Hass’ and ‘Pinkerton’. Thus, lower feeding damage on
‘Lamb Hass’ in the field may be due in part to the plant having domatia
suitable as refuges for natural enemies (Walter, 1996; Agrawal, 1997).
This research was supported in part by a grant from
the California Avocado Commission to M.S. Hoddle.
AGRAWAL, A.A. 1997. Do leaf domatia mediate
a plant mite mutualism? An experimental test of the effects on predators and
herbivores. Ecological Entomology 22: 371-376.
ANON. 1974. The ‘Hass’
mother tree.
APONTE, O., MCMURTRY, J.A.
1997. Damage on ‘Hass’ avocado leaves, webbing and nesting behaviour of Oligonychus perseae (Acari:
Tetranychidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 21: 265-272.
APPLEMAN, D. 1944.
Preliminary report on toxicity of avocado leaves.
BENDER, G.S. 1993. A new
mite problem in avocados.
BERGH, B.; ELLSTRAND, N.
1986. Taxonomy of the avocado.
BERGH, B.O.; SCORA, R.W.;
STOREY, B. 1973. A comparison of leaf terpenes in Persea subgenus Persea.
Botanical Gazette 134: 130-134.
BRUNE, W.; VAN LELYVELD, L.J. 1982. Biochemical comparison of leaves of
five avocado (Persea
BURGER, W.P.; NAUDÉ, T.W.;
VAN RENSBURG, I.B.J.; BOTHA, C.J.; PIENAAR, A.C.E., 1994. Avocado poisoning in
ostrich, pp. 546-551. In: Plant-associated
Toxins. Agricultural, Phytochemical and Ecological Aspects.Colegate. S. M.,
Dorling, R. (eds.), CAB International,
CAMERON, S.H.; BORST, G.
1938. Starch in the avocado tree. Proceedings of the American Society for
Horticultural Science 36: 255-258.
CHANG, C.-F.; ISOGAI, A.;
KAMIKADO, T.; MURAKOSHI, S.; SAKURAI, A.; TAMURA, S. 1975. Isolation and
structure elucidation of growth inhibitors for silkworm larvae from avocado
leaves. Agricultural Biology and Chemistry 39: 1167-1168.
CONDIT, I.J. 1932. Check
list of avocado varieties.
CRAIGMILL, A.L.; SEAWRIGHT,
A.A.; MATTILA, T.; Frost, A.J.
1992. The toxicity of avocado (Persea
EFRON, B. 1981.
Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jacknife, the bootstrap and
other methods. Biometrika 68: 589-599.
EL-HAMALAWI, Z.A.; MENGE, J.A. 1995. Seasonal fluctuations in the extent of colonization
of avocado plants by the stem canker pathogen Phytophthora citricola. Journal of the American Society of
Horticultural Science 120: 157-162.
FABER, B. 1997. The Persea
mite story. Citrograph 82: 12-13.
HUFFAKER, C.B.; VAN DE
VRIE, M.; MCMURTRY, J.A. 1969. The ecology of tetranychid mites and their
natural control. Annual Review of Entomology 14: 125-174.
JANDEL CORPORATION 1995.
SigmaScan™ and SigmaScan Pro For Windows™. User’s Manual. Jandel Scientific
Software,
JEPPSON, L.R.; KEIFER,
H.H.; BAKER, E.W. 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants.
JESIOTR, L.J.; SUSKI, Z.W.; BADOWSKA-CZUBIK, T. 1979. Food quality
influences on a spider mite population, p. 189-169. In: Rodriguez J.G. (Ed.), Recent Advances in Acarology,
KERGUELEN V.; HODDLE, M.S. 1999. Measuring mite feeding damage on
avocado leaves with automated image analysis software.
LAHAV, E.; BAR, Y.;
MCKENZIE, R.A.; BROWN, O.P.
1991. Avocado (Persea
MEYER, J.S.; INGERSOLL, C.G.; MCDONALD, L.L.; BOYCE, M.S. 1986.
Estimating uncertainty in population growth rates, jacknife vs. bootstrap
techniques. Ecology 67: 1156-1166.
MURAKOSHI, S.; ISOGAI, A.; CHANG, C.-F.; KAMIKADO, T.; SAKURAI, A.;
TAMURA, S. 1976. Effects of two components from the avocado leaves (Persea
NAKASONE, H. Y.; PAULL, R.
E. 1998. Tropical Fruits. CAB
International,
POPENOE, F.O. 1915. Varieties of the avocado. Report of the First
Semi-Annual Meeting of the
RODRIGUEZ, J.G. 1964. Nutritional studies in the
Acarina. Acarologia – Hors Série 6: 324-337.
RODRIGUEZ, J.G.; CAMBELL, M. 1961. Effects of gibberellin on
nutrition of the mites, Tetranychus
telarius and Panonychus ulmi.
Journal of Economic Entomology 54: 984-987.
RODRIGUEZ, J.G.; MAYNARD, D.E.; SMITH, JR., W.T. 1960. Effects of soil
insecticides and absorbents on plant sugars and resulting effect on mite
nutrition. Journal of Economic Entomology 53: 491-495.
RODRIGUEZ, J.G.; RODRIGUEZ, L.D. 1952. The relation between
minerals, B-complex vitamins and mite populations in tomato foliage. Annals of
the Entomological Society of
RODRIGUEZ-SOANA, C.; TRUMBLE, J. T.
1998. Effects
Of avocadofurans on larval survival, growth, and food preference of the
generalist herbivore, Spodoptera exigua.
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90: 131-140.
RODRIGUEZ-SOANA, C.; MILLAR, J. G.;
MAYNARD, D. F.; TRUMBLE, J. T. 1998. Novel antifeedant and insecticidal compounds from
avocado idioblast cell oil. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24: 867-889.
SANCES,
F.V.;TOSCANO, N.C.; HOFFMANN, M.P.; LAPRE, L.F.; JOHNSON, M.W.; BAILEY, J.B.
1982. Physiological responses of avocado leaves to avocado brown mite feeding
injury Oligonychus punicae.
Environmental Entomology 11: 516-518.
SCHOLEFIELD, P.B.; SEDGLEY, M.; ALEXANDER, D. 1985. Carbohydrate cycling
in relation to shoot growth, floral initiation and development and yield in the
avocado. Scientia Horticulturae 25: 99-110.
SCORA, R.W.; BERGH, B.O. 1990. The origins and taxonomy of avocado (Persea
SNEH, B.; GROSS, S., 1981. Toxicity of avocado leaves (Persea
SOUTHWOOD, T.R.E., 1978. Ecological Methods. Chapman and Hall,
STEIN, U.; KLINGAUF, F. 1990. Insecticidal effect of plant extracts from
tropical and subtropical species. Journal of Applied Entomology 110: 160-166.
SUN, P.I., 1963. Studies on the development of a chemically defined diet
for the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus
telarius L. M.S. Thesis,
THOMPSON, W. 1993. Progress slow on O.
perseae control.
VAN DER GEEST, L.P.S. 1985. Aspects of physiology, pp. 171-184. In: Spider Mites. Their Biology, Natural
Enemies and Control. Helle W., Sabelis M.W. (eds.), Elsevier.
WALTER, D.E. 1996. Living on leaves: mites, tomenta, and leaf domatia.
Annual Review of Entomology 41: 101-114.
|
Table 1. Percentage survival and
mean duration (± s.e.) in days of development of first generation (F1)
and second generation (F2) of
Oligonychus perseae from larva to adult at 25°C on leaves of three
cultivars of avocado collected at South Coast Field Station, California USA,
in April, May and July 1998. Sample sizes are indicated in parentheses. |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
April |
|
|
May |
|
|
July |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
duration of |
|
% |
duration of |
|
% |
duration of |
|
|
Cultivars |
|
survival |
development |
|
survival |
development |
|
survival |
development |
|
|
‘Hass’ |
|
20.7 |
10.5
± 0.42 |
|
81.8 |
9.7
± 0.18 |
|
63.2 |
9.9
± 0.08 |
|
|
|
|
(29) |
(6) |
|
(33) |
(27) |
|
(19) |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F1 |
Lamb Hass |
|
62.1 |
9.9
± 0.28 |
|
78.8 |
9.7
± 0.16 |
|
65.0 |
10.9
± .18 |
|
|
|
|
(29) |
(18) |
|
(33) |
(26) |
|
(20) |
(13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinkerton |
|
39.3 |
10.9
± 0.36 |
|
76.7 |
10.6
± .24 |
|
42.9 |
11.3
± 0.62 |
|
|
|
|
(28) |
(11) |
|
(30) |
(23) |
|
(7) |
(3) |
|
|
Hass |
|
- |
- |
|
36.1 |
11.6
± 0.85 |
| ||